I Don't Want No Retrospective

    The dialogue in Harrell Fletcher’s work between kumbaya campfire spirit and its descent into bathic self parody defines for me what social practice art should be. A rollicking journey between heartfelt sincerity and knowing parody. If only radio call-in shows functioned like that the world would be a better place.

You would think because Fletcher often works with non-artists that his projects would be unpredictable, chaotic. That’s why you introduce the outside world into the art world—to shake things up. But somehow he manages to spoon off the same oleaginous delicacy regardless of who goes in the pot. I guess this him a kind of stylist.

    In Selections from Michael Bravo at the CCA Wattis Institute for Contemporary Art, Fletcher curates a survey of work by Bravo, a life-long mentor and his sister’s ex husband. Sometimes Bravo’s work appears lucid and original. The line drawings of street scenes and interiors convey the pre-verbal strangeness of space and form the way a child might experience them. Sculptures of figures made from colorful objects encased in plastic are so over the top they cannot be denied.  When Bravo’s off, however, as in a large, messy abstract painting inspired by South America seen from a plane, it’s like being trapped in a bad corner of the De Rosa Preserve.

Bravo’s work has a folk art aesthetic. He collects sticks from his walks and then covers them with resin and silicone. His gifts to the young Fletcher, a carved wooden mobile for the crib, charming wooden ships and a platoon of carved wooden soldiers actually look more like folk art than art and further blur the line between the two.

But it’s almost impossible to imagine Bravo’s earnest, folky works in this citadel of curatorial irony and critique without the aid of Fletcher. So this is either the greatest act of curatorial nepotism since Charles Saatchi underwrote the Young British Arists show at the Brooklyn Museum in 1999 or it’s something completely different.

    Fletcher’s title and wall text suggest the former. In that pitch perfect, awe-shucks voice of the common man, Fletcher explains Bravo’s work and their personal relationship as though we were sitting on a hill in Humboldt County, throwing grass into the air and watching which way the wind was blowing. He never makes reference to the oddity of the situation. He never tries to pre-empt the obvious question: Is it okay to do this, to put my friend in a big show when there are so many other candidates whose work would be more appropriate?  But if you left Selections From Michael Bravo thinking that all you need to get a show at Wattis is to know an art star than you fell into the trap.

The genius of Fletcher's work and his voice is the way it hides the complexity and chaos behind a veneer of simplicity. Bravo’s work is only one subject of the Wattis show. It is equally an occasion for Fletcher to explore curation and its values, and he makes use of the specific familial situation between he and Bravo.

In the most basic sense, Fletcher has put the curatorial on equal footing with the art making, flushed the curatorial decision-making out of the back-room and put it on display in the front, and made the process of looking at Bravo’s art impossible without being conscious of the framing devices. The show’s not called Selections for nothing.

In the world of institutional critique, where artists investigate the values behind their gallery’s decisions, the focus is usually on how dominant culture has excluded alternative voices under the rubric of objective standards. Fletcher’s privileging of the personal over the objective is so over the top it seems both to mock our faith in the traditional, so-called objective standards and all the queer, feminist, post-colonial alternatives that have risen up to challenge them. The family politics posed here are the most brutal form of identity politics and the fact that two white guys put it together makes it even more volatile.

Fletcher’s use of personal narrative to materialize a conversation about curatorial values is kind of amazing. He mixes personal items in with works of art, corrupting the classical model of just artobjects, and asserting the equal value of both. In the wall text, many of his thoughts about Bravo are seen through a scrim of childhood memories. These have to be the least stable, most subjective kinds of phenomena to base a show on. And yet he does, without apology or explanation, putting them where you are used to seeing scholarship and some kind of art-historically informed logic.

At the center of this show is the way Fletcher’s relationship to Bravo sends up the Oedipal struggle that normally takes place between curators, who are seen exercising parental control, and artists, who notoriously rebel against it. Institutional critique reversed that dynamic. Artists like Michael Asher and Fred Wilson became the knowing grown ups, and the curators were demoted to misguided children. It's like all those family shows of the 80s where the grown-ups were hoplessly dated and the kids had all the wisdom.

In Selections, the Oedipal maze is more confusing: Bravo was a paternal influence on Fletcher, both as the first adult artist he knew and then as a teacher. But it’s Fletcher the student who has the responsibility of curating Bravo the older artist. In a reverse of institutional critique, it’s Bravo the artist who seems conventional and responsible and Fletcher the curator who is out of control.

In fact the whole first impression of the show is undermined. What looks at first like a gesture of curatorial generosity from a young famous artist to his older, less well-known mentor, turns out to be the opposite. It’s Bravo the dad giving the big assist to Fletcher the child, this time as the straight man so the younger artist can squeeze a hearty curatorial laugh.

Comments

[Chef Pants]

What looks at first like a gesture of curatorial generosity from a young famous artist to his older, less well-known mentor, turns out to be the opposite

[ClubPenguin]

It's like all those family shows of the 80s where the grown-ups were hoplessly dated and the kids had all the wisdom.

[Sale Cheap Nike Shoes]

It's like all those family shows of the 80s where the grown-ups were hoplessly dated and the kids had all the wisdom

[バーバリーマフラー]

東京電力福島第一原発事故で東電に巨額の損失が生じたのは、経営陣が地震や津波の安全対策を怠ってきたためだとして、株主らが東電に対し、歴代の経営陣に損害賠償請求訴訟を起こすよう求める書面を提出する方針を固めたことが分かった
請求額や対象者を検討した上で、今月中にも提出したいとしている。提出後、６０日以内に東電が提訴しない場合、株主代表訴訟を東京地裁に起こすという。
株主の一人は「このままでは、過去の経営陣の責任追及があいまいになってしまう。裁判で責任の所在をはっきりさせるべきだ」と話した。一方、東電は「内容を把握していないので、コメントは差し控える」としている。

[thenorthface]

McDonald then unloaded a blast toward the far post and the Diplomats took the early edge

[Ray Ban Aviator]

Both My brother and I are interested on your blog very much.and will recommend it to my classmates.Thanks

[Ray Ban Uk]

I am wondering How did you get so nice post?Hope you can keep writing more for us in the future.Thanks very much.

[Ray Ban Wayfarer]

What amazing post,I have been looking for several days.I will recommend it to my friends.Thanks.

[ティンバーランド]

ブランドとしてティンバーランドの発売以来、高い人気を誇って、今は各年齢層
にも流行っています。興味があれば、当店と連絡ください、いつでもいいです。

[new era custom hats]

A friend to send children to the United States to study, that the child did not go two days bought a second hand Land Rover means of transport, that is because the Land Rover in a foreign country "too cheap." http://www.newerahatfactory.com/